Topic: Crunchbang lpia on the Dell Mini 9
CrunchBang lpia on the Dell Mini
Background: My Dell Mini 9 came with Ubuntu 8.04 pre-installed. The Dell version of Ubuntu uses an lpia (Low Power Intel Architecture) kernel rather than the typical i386. Allegedly, this lpia kernel has some benefits for Atom-based netbooks like the Dell Mini and Asus eee: better battery life, faster startup, snappier performance, etc. I want to test whether or not these claims are true by installing #! over Ubuntu 9.04 lpia.
DISCLAIMER: The "regular" i386 version of 9.04 is currently the best and easiest choice for Mini 9 owners. All hardware is recognized out of the box. I am not recommending that anyone actually go through the process below, just sharing my experiences. ![]()
First step: I installed Ubuntu 9.04 beta using the daily build of the lpia alternate cd: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ports/daily/current/
Next, I ran the CrunchBang 9.04 install script: http://crunchbanglinux.org/build-scripts/testing/
The script completed except for one big problem: it did not install any packages because crunchbang-desktop is an i386 package, not an lpia package.
Next step is to download crunchbang-desktop and convert it to an lpia package using these instructions: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=962835
Basically, the most important step in the instructions is to open the Control file and change architecture to lpia. I also found that several packages could not be installed (see below), so I removed those packages from this file.
Now, I installed the new lpia crunchbang-desktop and I have a functional Crunchbang desktop!
Problem packages:
bmpanel crunchbang-bmpanel-themes (I repackaged bmpanel for lpia, then was able to install the themes)
adobe-flashplugin (use flashplugin-installer instead)
linux-headers-generic (replace with linux-headers-lpia)
gftp (broken dependency, gftp-text too old)
qgtkstyle usplash-theme-crunchbang transset-df (need repackaging, also depends on newer version of libqt4-gui)
udmz-cursor-theme winff (missing from lpia repository)
So far, I like the lpia version but I can't prove whether it has any advantage over i386. I am curious if anyone has any benchmarking suggestions to get some hard scientific numbers on performance, battery life, etc. It would be especially cool if someone with an i386 build on a Dell Mini 9 could run the same benchmarks so we can compare. ![]()
Last edited by snowpine (2009-04-18 22:03:23)