rfquerin wrote:Would all art submitted to those designated threads be placed in the package? That's fine with me, but I think it's prudent for someone to still place their artwork in their own thread for people to comment on. It's an iterative process, and things get improved. Only if the creator of the work is happy with it should it be placed into the thread for end of month packaging. I only say this because you could get lots of variations on a theme (this I know). I think this should be emphasized just so people like me don't submit 20 wallpapers to the thread and then 80% of them are very very much alike.
Agreed, the iterative process is important and personally I would like to see the individual threads continue as they are. There are some excellent threads and it would be a real shame to lose them. Maybe the monthly art pack threads should only contain links to work held in other threads? If we could get some details down beforehand, we could start each monthly thread with an instructional post, which might help everyone to understand the process.
Also, inevitably (or wishfully never) I'm assuming it's corenominal who is the authority on whether something gets pulled or not. There is no "art team" for #! is there?
Personally, I would really like for this to be a community effort and I would not like to be the authority on what gets pulled or not, I dislike the authorities! 
No, there is no "art team", but it might be nice if one were created.
One other question I would have (for now anyway) is what kind of guidelines for artwork resolution, format etc would be required. I think some degree of organization is required if only to make people "think" you know what you're doing. 
I'm very good at fooling people when it comes to this. 
As am I. Agreed, see end section in the first part of my reply.
