I agree, stop apologizing! 
Actually, my problems have been solved by following the wiki entry. It looks like it was unetbootin. After dd'ing the same image to a stick, it all works. Happy camper! 
1 2010-03-22 09:02:59
Re: USB Install (125 replies, posted in Devel: CrunchBang 10 "Statler")
2 2010-03-21 19:31:40
Re: USB Install (125 replies, posted in Devel: CrunchBang 10 "Statler")
kirmonkey wrote:
Do your systems have CD drives that you have chosen not to use? It could be that the installer is giving different options for different hardware.
Nope. The EeePC 901 which I am using has no optical drive.
3 2010-03-21 13:00:15
Re: USB Install (125 replies, posted in Devel: CrunchBang 10 "Statler")
Thanks for all the info. Will try again with the instructions from the wiki this afternoon.
4 2010-03-20 15:52:35
Topic: USB Install (125 replies, posted in Devel: CrunchBang 10 "Statler")
I copied the Xfce version of Statler to a USB drive using unetbootin. The live session works, but the installer wants to load some CD drivers on my EeePC and then errors out saying it can't load stuff from the USB drive. I've tried multiple USB sticks.
Any suggestions?
5 2010-03-20 15:49:05
Re: Suggestion: banish Mono (17 replies, posted in Devel: CrunchBang 10 "Statler")
arpinux wrote:
Richard Stallman say the same "ban mono"
Nope, he doesn't. He discourages it's use: http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono
"This is not to say that implementing C# is a bad thing. Free C# implementations permit users to run their C# programs on free platforms, which is good. (The GNU Project has an implementation of C# also, called Portable.NET.) Ideally we want to provide free implementations for all languages that programmers have used."
Calling that a "ban" is stretching it.
6 2009-03-31 06:58:27
Re: Excessive swapping with the "Pictures" screensaver (5 replies, posted in Help & Support (Stable))
Neither CrunchBang nor Ubuntu have an "open root account". If you mean the fact that root has the same password as the first user by default, that can hardly be called open. You can't even log in as root either.
7 2009-02-18 20:41:26
Re: CrunchEee review in LO77 (2 replies, posted in CrunchBang Talk)
LOL! Well, I think Katy would object to that.
Glad you liked the show. We are honoured to have you as a listener.
8 2009-02-18 12:07:02
Topic: CrunchEee review in LO77 (2 replies, posted in CrunchBang Talk)
Just a quick FYI that we released Linux Outlaws 77 yesterday which includes a review of CrunchEee and CrunchBang .02 
If you are interested, you can listen to it here: http://linuxoutlaws.com/podcast/77
Hope people enjoy it!
Fab 
9 2009-02-12 20:22:44
Re: CrunchBang featured in Linux Format (26 replies, posted in CrunchBang Talk)
Wow.... Nice to see #! getting even more publicity. This thing is really taking off, isn't it?
10 2009-01-27 10:22:45
Re: CrunchBang Linux 8.10.02 Released (70 replies, posted in News & Announcements)
Hmmm..... What exactly is involved in upgrading? I am contemplating just reinstalling as well...
11 2009-01-25 17:39:43
Re: Crunchwood wallpaper ( gtk and openbox theme added) (19 replies, posted in Artwork & Screenshots)
Wow! The theme looks amazing!
12 2009-01-24 00:20:39
Re: Happy Birthday corenominal! (32 replies, posted in Off Topic / General Chat)
corenominal wrote:
Thank you everyone!
LOL.... OK, it was your birthday in CET. LOL! Have a great day, dude!
13 2009-01-24 00:00:31
Re: Happy Birthday corenominal! (32 replies, posted in Off Topic / General Chat)
Well, his registration on my forum says so....
14 2009-01-23 23:44:32
Re: LUGRadio Live 2009 [& OggCamp] (10 replies, posted in Off Topic / General Chat)
The Outlaws will be there. Now, you have to decide if that is an incentive or a thread for you...
15 2009-01-23 23:41:45
Re: Introducing the CrunchBangers Launchpad Team (53 replies, posted in News & Announcements)
Joined.
16 2009-01-23 23:38:57
Topic: Happy Birthday corenominal! (32 replies, posted in Off Topic / General Chat)
Have a great one, dude! 
"For he's a jolly good fellow...!"
17 2009-01-21 13:07:55
Re: Striped LO wallpaper (9 replies, posted in Artwork & Screenshots)
corenominal wrote:
I have visions of a cowboy wearing a pinstriped suit. Nice work fabsh!
LOL! Pretty much....
18 2009-01-21 08:37:13
Re: CrunchEee Gwibber bugs (5 replies, posted in Feedback & Suggestions)
Works now. Probably my fault. Sorry about this...
The interface issue is valid, though.
19 2009-01-21 08:22:24
Re: CrunchBang Linux 8.10.02 Released (70 replies, posted in News & Announcements)
I really love CrunchEee on my 901. Awesome. Very nice job, corenominal. Now, where are these update instructions?
20 2009-01-21 08:14:31
Topic: Striped LO wallpaper (9 replies, posted in Artwork & Screenshots)
Here's my current wallpaper. Thanks to omns for telling me how to do the stripes!
http://lamerk.org/art#wallpaper
21 2009-01-20 15:14:39
Re: CrunchEee Gwibber bugs (5 replies, posted in Feedback & Suggestions)
OK, it maybe a config issue then. Don't mind it. I will look into the matter....
22 2009-01-20 08:01:57
Re: CrunchEee Gwibber bugs (5 replies, posted in Feedback & Suggestions)
I don't get errors on the .01 machine. Is it the same Gwibber version?
23 2009-01-19 23:11:02
Topic: CrunchEee Gwibber bugs (5 replies, posted in Feedback & Suggestions)
Some things I noticed in Gwibber:
- Laconica servers do not work, error is: InvalidURL: nonnumeric port: "
- CrunchEee theme: post time is significantly bigger font than the rest, looks a bit shite
Hope this helps! I'm off to bed.
24 2009-01-19 08:40:06
Re: CrunchBang Linux 8.10.02 Released (70 replies, posted in News & Announcements)
arpinux wrote:
rox-filer: it's too ugly, it's kde ........ HEY, a little more conversation and/or curiosity in there !!!
if you don't use it ok.... but let other people give a try
I never said other people weren't allowed to try it. I just said I think it sucks.
arpinux wrote:
really ??? ugly ???
Yes. Really. Ugly. Ugl-eee.
25 2009-01-18 23:52:02
Re: CrunchBang Linux 8.10.02 Released (70 replies, posted in News & Announcements)
anonymous wrote:
To me, its just ugly
Yeah, that too. That was kinda implied in the KDE comparison. 