This really is a philosophical argument. For now at least.
Let me say here something that I have said before. Having watched Ubuntu's development since 7.04, I feel strongly within myself that it is moving toward a proprietary like nature. Every one can disagree if you want. I have no problem with that. But, I strongly feel that this is taking place. There are many little things that lead me to think this way. And then there are some, shall I say, "intangibles", things that I can not quite put my finger on, so to speak. More akin to an intuitive insight. Spaceman can say what he will, I am sticking to my guns on this. Remember Mac's are Unix based. And Shuttleworth has a thing for Mac.
1.Are there too many Linux distributions?
2. Is the Linux community spreading itself too thin to its own detriment?
3.Ask yourself, if there was only one Linux distribution, which one should it be?
4.If you can answer the previous question, ask yourself, are you already using it?
5.If not, why not?
On the first point -- I agree with anonymous. Too many package managers.
second point -- Perhaps not. But the larger community is filled with a personality type that is constantly eroding its reputation. Image is everything. Ms = buisness suite; Mac = cool demeanor; Linux = dirty hippies with a bad attitude.
Thirdly -- singularity = target. Our strength is in our diversity. This somewhat negates point one, but, notwithstanding, it is a truth nontheless. Variety keeps us virus free. It also dilutes our capacity to reach John Q Public. We need a unified front, minus the fanaticism of FSF or the snobbery of elitist Debian.
Point four -- in agreement with IgorP. This is the longest and most peaceful I have evry been with any distro. Corenominal, I salute you and your fine work, and this fantastic community. A gem in the Linux crown.
Point five -- For me the point is mute.
Michael