Re: Have you tried #! with DE other than Xfce or Openbox?

I just "upgraded" a Crunchbang 9.04 laptop to Ubuntu 10.10 and if it had been my machine I would haver immediately downgraded it again.  It had Unity, and you should be very glad if you don't know what it is.  Behind that was Metacity and possibly more stuff.  Luckily it isn't too difficult to change to Openbox which I still prefer to anything else I've seen.

Maybe I should try IceWM.  Looks a lot like Openbox with icons on the menus?

Re: Have you tried #! with DE other than Xfce or Openbox?

Icewm also includes a panel, but you can disable it.

Re: Have you tried #! with DE other than Xfce or Openbox?

^^ Yes the upgrade from 9.04.01 dragged in lots of dependencies related to the ever growing ubuntu-desktop meta package. This can be worked around but it is a clunky process. It's one of the reasons that CrunchBang is now Debian based.

A Creative Commoner | My images at Google+ | A Waldorf Review

Silence is sometimes the best answer - Dalai Lama.

Re: Have you tried #! with DE other than Xfce or Openbox?

Sherlock's Hitchhiker's Guide to IceWM, Chapter 6:

iann wrote:

Maybe I should try IceWM.  Looks a lot like Openbox with icons on the menus?

In IceWM, you have icons in the menus, but you can remove or replace them in the menu file. Two example lines of /home/hs/.icewm/menu:

prog "Dateimanager _Thunar" folder thunar
prog "Web-Browser _Firefox" /usr/share/pixmaps/firefox.png firefox

Firefox will have the icon /usr/share/pixmaps/firefox.png, thunar will have the icon folder_16x16.xpm / folder_32x32.xpm, found in the default directory /usr/share/icewm/icons

If you don't want to have icons, write a not existing icon file into the menu file cool

The menu file has an easy syntax without html / xml. You can begin a line with 1 of 3 keywords: prog, separator, menu. separator draws a line between two entries. menu makes sub-menus, sub-sub-menus and so on.

The toolbar file (for the application-start-icons in the taskbar) has the same syntax. Here is an example submenu in /home/hs/.icewm/toolbar:

menu "Ende" /usr/share/pixmaps/gnome-logo-icon-transparent.png {
   prog "Ausschalten" xterm sudo /sbin/shutdown -h now
   prog "Neu starten" xterm sudo /sbin/shutdown -r now
   }

The keys file (for shortcuts) has a similar syntax. Here are some example lines of /home/hs/.icewm/keys   (# = comment)

# with mouse pointer:
key "Print" /bin/sh -c "/usr/bin/gnome-panel-screenshot"
# without mouse pointer:
key "Shift+Print" scrot '%Y%m%d-%H%M%S.png' -e 'mv $f ~/Bilder/Screenshots/'
key "Super+r"            thunar
key "Alt+Ctrl+y"        geany

The keys Super, Alt, Ctrl, Shift, Print are named Super, Alt, Ctrl, Shift, Print cool

Re: Have you tried #! with DE other than Xfce or Openbox?

IceWM-lite does not have the panel/taskbar

So now I have  Fluxbox, IceWM and PekWM besides Xfce and Openbox.
I may not do much distro-hopping but I make up for it with WM/DE hopping  lol

Get Dropbox and an extra 250 mb http://db.tt/wAizqw0

Re: Have you tried #! with DE other than Xfce or Openbox?

Sherlock's Hitchhiker's Guide to IceWM, Chapter 7:

pseudotsuga:
I tried icewm, which I liked, but the lack of good themes drove me away.

There are many themes in http://box-look.org
I like IceNine (on the following screenshots with gtk-theme Aurora-midnight), and I think, some people on the "dark side" will like it too ...except the menu button in the left bottom corner?
http://thumbnails26.imagebam.com/11783/41a103117828592.jpg

No problem. You can easy change it: Screenshot 1 shows file manager thunar with a number of thumbnails, /home/hs/.icewm/IceNine/icewm.xpm is marked. Remove or rename it. Copy the icewm.xpm (from another theme, which you like) to the IceNine folder. Restart IceWM.

http://thumbnails38.imagebam.com/11783/ec87ac117828602.jpg

Done. I only renamed the file, didn't copy another one, so the fallback is active: Screenshot 2 shows the debian-menu-button, and the menu – well, do I have an eagle's eyes? Or a big screen? No, I haven't. So let's change the font size: Screenshot 2 shows editor geany with the file /home/hs/.icewm/IceNine/default.theme, in there the line "MenuFontNameXft = zekton:size=7". This is the line to edit.

http://thumbnails36.imagebam.com/11783/5eee17117828627.jpg

Done. Also changed: "QuickSwitchFontNameXft" and "ColorQuickSwitch", because the color of the selected task was the same like the non-selected tasks. Now, the selection is visible.

Changing the elements of IceWM is fun.

Re: Have you tried #! with DE other than Xfce or Openbox?

jeffreyC wrote:

IceWM-lite does not have the panel/taskbar

So now I have  Fluxbox, IceWM and PekWM besides Xfce and Openbox.
I may not do much distro-hopping but I make up for it with WM/DE hopping  lol

I'm wait'n for those scrots dude...:D

Proceed with confidence!
http://eldervlacoste.deviantart.com/

Re: Have you tried #! with DE other than Xfce or Openbox?

I've personally switched over to awesome with crunchbang.
I just find its much easier to get work done in. I spend much less time moving windows around, minimzing and maximizing, dragging around etc.
I always liked Windows 7 feature of dragging to the sides made the window take up half the screen, and awesome was a natural extension to some extent.
Plus with crunchbang I've already gotten used to using shortcuts galore, so that wasn't difficult either.

just call me...
~FSM~

Re: Have you tried #! with DE other than Xfce or Openbox?

Currently running Statler and GNOME Shell...

Re: Have you tried #! with DE other than Xfce or Openbox?

I've been using dwm for a while and crunchbang makes it really easy, ready for customization without too much trouble. I've tried doing it from a minimal debian install but I only recommend that as a way of learning about linux and debian. dwm is simple and fast and does all the things I want it to do. Openbox is really very well designed but dwm is faster, simpler, saves valuable screen real estate, its entirely keyboard-driven (vim-ish) and I get geek-cred for using it. Alot of folks use dwm with gdm but I recommend ditching gdm if you're the only one using the computer. Instead I use nodm, which is available in the repos.

I'd also like to agree with an earlier posting, dwm is great for productivity in that you can quickly change, resize windows, launch stuff, etc, without leaving the keyboard, but Its horrible for productivity in that it leads to endless tweaking, seeing what others have done, and comparing. A good dwm config is always only half-done. I have a small to-do list of scripts and tweaks i'd like to make. What a tremendous waste of time for so much time-savings.:wq

Re: Have you tried #! with DE other than Xfce or Openbox?

Has anyone tried Bluetile WM?

http://linux.softpedia.com/progScreensh … 55035.html

Last edited by ElderV.LaCoste (2011-02-26 20:56:36)

Proceed with confidence!
http://eldervlacoste.deviantart.com/

Re: Have you tried #! with DE other than Xfce or Openbox?

ElderV.LaCoste wrote:

Has anyone tried Bluetile WM?

http://linux.softpedia.com/progScreensh … 55035.html

It's nothing more than XMonad.

-- Thomas Adam

Re: Have you tried #! with DE other than Xfce or Openbox?

ThomasAdam wrote:
ElderV.LaCoste wrote:

Has anyone tried Bluetile WM?

http://linux.softpedia.com/progScreensh … 55035.html

It's nothing more than XMonad.

-- Thomas Adam

Meaning it mimics Xmonad or is built on Xmonad or?

Repo info says it is designed for Gnome. Will it work on Openbox like Pytyle do?

/Martin

Re: Have you tried #! with DE other than Xfce or Openbox?

MartinRF wrote:
ThomasAdam wrote:
ElderV.LaCoste wrote:

Has anyone tried Bluetile WM?

http://linux.softpedia.com/progScreensh … 55035.html

It's nothing more than XMonad.

-- Thomas Adam

Meaning it mimics Xmonad or is built on Xmonad or?

Repo info says it is designed for Gnome. Will it work on Openbox like Pytyle do?

/Martin

No, it *is* a configuration for XMonad.  There was some effort to get it merged into XMonad proper, I do not recall how successful that was, check their mailing list archives.

And yes, it does run under GNOME, just like XMonad "pure" can, without the Bluetile config.

-- Thomas Adam

Re: Have you tried #! with DE other than Xfce or Openbox?

Enlightenment is quite nice, once you get the feel for it and tweak it to your likings. However, the distros that it has appeared on so far have very unattractive default settings that can be quick to turn people off, especially if your shopping distros.

Re: Have you tried #! with DE other than Xfce or Openbox?

A couple of the Mint Devs are working on a LinuxMint version with a Mint-ified Debian 'testing' with the new Fluxbox 1.3  cool

If you like Fluxbox and/or have wanted to try the new Flux 1.3 . . . Look for this one soon.

Registered Linux User: #497030
LinuxMint Forum | DeviantART page | Lost-in-the-Box Forum  |  Ask.Debian
#!Crunchbang 'Statler' (Openbox) -- LinuxMint-Debian-Fluxbox Edition

Re: Have you tried #! with DE other than Xfce or Openbox?

Yeah,

FluxBox and GNOME.

FluxBox  - in my opinion - is a pretty colored and reduced to the basics environment.

GNOME - in my opinion - has an overkill of software and menuentries; not lean, not lightweight and too big.

Regards

"If you can dream it, you can do it!" [Walt Disney]

Re: Have you tried #! with DE other than Xfce or Openbox?

Hi, I've got XFCE statler + Enlightenment . ( At the Desktop ) ..... and Chakra Kde at the laptop. I like the solid basis #! gives me, but hoping improves in  both alternate  DE.

Last edited by eduadeje (2011-03-10 13:44:07)

Re: Have you tried #! with DE other than Xfce or Openbox?

Since, the Debian Squeeze release went 'stable' ... and 'me' being an Xfce junkie ... I downloaded #!Statler with Xfce. (r20110207)

I had no idea how much I would miss Openbox  sad

I finally (just today) had to install Openbox to my existing #! and boot into that . . . Openbox is familiar ground.  big_smile  Like coming home.

Last edited by vrkalak (2011-03-10 19:29:04)

Registered Linux User: #497030
LinuxMint Forum | DeviantART page | Lost-in-the-Box Forum  |  Ask.Debian
#!Crunchbang 'Statler' (Openbox) -- LinuxMint-Debian-Fluxbox Edition

Re: Have you tried #! with DE other than Xfce or Openbox?

Sherlock's Hitchhiker's Guide to IceWM, Chapter 8:

IceWM works together with debian / debian based distros very well:

  • When you install IceWM (it's only one apt-get away), a menu with all your applications will be created automagically.

  • When you install an additional application, this menu will be updated automagically.

http://thumbnails34.imagebam.com/12719/eb3399127180974.jpg

Main menu = favourites + 3 lines
The last 3 lines: Programs, Help, Settings

The new application will be in a submenu of Programs ...might be a place where you don't look for it. Example: "geany" is not in "editors" but in "programming".

The automagically updated file: /etc/X11/icewm/programs
It's useful to know this file. Example: I wanted to include synaptic into a submenu of my favourites. Simply "synaptic" didn't work. Solution: "gksu synaptic"!
Copied from /etc/X11/icewm/programs to ~/.icewm/menu:

    prog "Synaptic" /usr/share/pixmaps/synaptic.png gksu synaptic

I am using favourites (and favourites submenus / subsubmenus) only.

Re: Have you tried #! with DE other than Xfce or Openbox?

Anyone with  LXDE installed on #!, just curious because lately have been spending quite some time on Xfce, and yes it is very good...but is the grass greener...?

#!, all else is but a shadow!

Re: Have you tried #! with DE other than Xfce or Openbox?

I used Lubuntu for well over a year before moving to #! and the default DE is LXDE. It's an ok desktop but in my opinion it still needs some polishing. I would sometimes get bugs like random freezes. But then again I don't know if that was due to LXDE or PCManFM(the distros default file manager) since that would usually happen when I was messing around in the file manager.

I don't really know how LXDE performs on #! though. I did install it a couple weeks ago just for nostalgia sake but I then turned around and pretty much immediately uninstalled it. I'm so used to WM's now that even lightweight DE's like LXDE/XFCE seem like a bloated hog to me. There's just a bunch of features that I no longer need, so I'll stick with WM's for the rest of my days I believe.

Anyways I do think LXDE is a bit lighter than XFCE, but in my opinion the grass is not greener. XFCE is a bit more polished and bug free. Give it a try for yourself though and see how you dig it. It's only an apt-get away.