Topic: WindowMaker dead?

I've come to like Openbox during my time with #!. It's a great window manager. However, I have kind of a soft spot for WindowMaker. I used to use it in Slackware, and I liked that it could be configured so easily, and it was light on resources, so it performed very well on my PIII 866. Unfortunately, from what I can find through Google and the project's website, it seems like the project is dead. I searched the WM/DE Talk section of the forums and found no more than 4 or 5 total mentions of WindowMaker, all of which were past tense, some of which mentioning how it "was" a good window manager. The fact that the latest release is in the Debian stable repo is also troubling to me, and the last update on the website is from 2008. Of course, the last update before that was from 2006, so I guess they're not too concerned with constant, possibly unnecessary updates.

I figure that if anyone has information on the status of WindowMaker, it would be someone on these forums. I suppose that if it really is dead, I'm prepared to make fully make the move to Openbox, because it's almost as easy to configure the way I want. Of course, there's also nothing stopping me from using the last version of WindowMaker, so I might do that, but I'd be more comfortable with a window manager that's being actively maintained. Also, AfterStep isn't quite the same. I've tried it, but I still prefer WindowMaker by a large margin.

Thank you in advance for any information on this.

Re: WindowMaker dead?

As far as I know active development really ended back in 06, there seemed to be a small attempt to revive it, but I never hear much about it in a very long time. IIRC Window Maker was meant for GNUstep, which I also haven't heard much about in some time, though as I understand it, that at least is still in active development.

Really 2k1ish Window Maker was really the best looking thing that ran on my Intel Triton based PC (I was way out of date) and I do have a soft spot for it. IIRC Chis Green the guy who compiled the old FAQ himself switched to FVWM2 so, I think that is a pretty solid sign that it isn't really supported much  anymore.

Of Course, the source is still out there, and it is possible the project could be revived, if anyone wants to put the effort into it they could. I only work in Pascal though wink so I certainly won't be messing with it, someone who is handy with C though could.

Edit:
John H. Robinson, IV (jaqque @ debian.org) would probably know better the exact history IIRC he was the one that was reviving it in 08, at least I think that is who it was.

Last edited by Val_B (2011-05-17 00:11:34)

Re: WindowMaker dead?

Thank you for the news. That's exactly what I wanted to know. I'm definitely disappointed, but I can't say I'm surprised. I may install the last release anyway, but I'll look into FVWM2, also.

If anyone else has any suggestions for a lightweight, easily-configurable* window manager, I'm open to them. Openbox hasn't done me wrong, but like most people here, I can get bored of one window manager, so I'd like to get comfortable with others. I'll look into how to configure Fluxbox, but every time I use it, I get frustrated because I can't figure out how to get the slit to work. I'm about to install it and try to find some documentation for it.

*By "easily-configurable", I mean a window manager where I don't have to learn a scripting/programming language to be able to edit the config files (that means no Awesome, as much as I liked it; I want to concentrate on relearning Java, and a second language might be a distraction). A  GUI would be a plus, but after messing with Conky and Tint2, I figure it couldn't hurt to do things the hard way.

Re: WindowMaker dead?

My mate Palemoon has a WindowMaker based distro called Liquid Lemur http://liquidlemur.org/

He is in contact with the Window Maker devs and gets the latest verisons.

We created a custom Wmaker/Fluxbox distro together a while back, and I have to say that Palemoon is pretty awesome with Wmaker, so check it out.

Liquid Lemur has been built the same way as Crunchbang so i'm pretty sure he'd help you if you wanted to get the latest Wmaker as your default Crunchbang desktop.

Re: WindowMaker dead?

Wow. That's great news. I'm checking out the Liquid Lemur website now. Thanks for the heads up.

But just to clarify, are you saying that there is still some active development going on for WindowMaker? If so, do you know why there hasn't been a release in 5 years? Is it just slow, relaxed development at this point, so as to not cause stress to the developers while they enjoy their hobby? Is a universal release planned eventually, or is the only way to get it from now on going to be through the Liquid Lemur guys? Are you saying that the WMaker in Liquid Lemur is newer than 0.92? I was very disappointed to find out that this was the last stable release. They were so close to 1.0, and I never experienced any bugs in 0.92, so I can't imagine 1.0 was far off.

I'm sorry for asking so many questions. I was afraid my favorite window manager was permanently dead, and you've given me new hope. If you don't know the answers to any of my questions, that's perfectly fine. I can't expect you to know everything, especially since you and most other people probably never really give much thought to WMaker as it seems to be overshadowed by the *boxes and other "cool", trendy window managers like Awesome (all of which are perfectly fine, but are not WMaker).

Anyway, thank you for replying and giving me somewhere to look. It's greatly appreciated. I'm off to search through the Liquid Lemur website a bit more.

Re: WindowMaker dead?

Oh I like this!  I'm gonna try it out as soon as the torrents go back up.  I started a Fluxbox thread here:

http://crunchbanglinux.org/forums/topic … ngfluxbox/

and there is a Joe's Window Manager thread here:

http://crunchbanglinux.org/forums/topic … wm-config/

You've probably already seen them but just in case.  smile

Last edited by ElderV.LaCoste (2011-05-17 13:30:03)

Proceed with confidence!
http://eldervlacoste.deviantart.com/

Re: WindowMaker dead?

Oh intresting, the Liquid Lemur guy seemed to have got his version from Carlos Mafra according to their dev log, who seems to have at least been doing some patches, poking around a bit I found http://lists.windowmaker.org/dev/mail22.html and if you look through it, you will see that at least a few people have been working on it, but it mostly seems the bugfix type of work, though I didn't read too many posts.

Oddly enough this has all the usual names on it, but seems to only be about a year old http://hg.windowmaker.info/wmaker/file/7accebd7c65b/

So, while the project seems pretty dead, there is at least some work on it, I would be quite interested to see Liquid Lemur bring some enhancements to Window Maker. I did enjoy it as a wm.

Re: WindowMaker dead?

@ElderV.LaCoste: Thank you for the suggestions. I actually tried Fluxbox for a little while this morning. I like it a lot, and it has support for WMaker-like dockapps in the slit, I also liked how easy it was to transfer the applicable entries from my Openbox autostart.sh to the Fluxbox startup file. However, one little thing kind of bugged me. Chrome doesn't fully maximize in Fluxbox, unless there's a setting I missed that would fix it. I'm going to go back into it later and see if I can't figure out how to configure the UI a little bit.

@Val_B: Thanks for the links. That's good news. Perhaps they'll release 0.95 or something this year. I, for one, will definitely be checking out the Liquid Lemur beta this Friday. In the meantime, I will probably install the ancient 0.92 version from the Debian repo to play with.

Re: WindowMaker dead?

EndlessDissent wrote:

Chrome doesn't fully maximize in Fluxbox, unless there's a setting I missed that would fix it.

In Chrome/Chromium's settings, try enabling "Use system title bar and borders".

Note: ** Please read before posting **

BTW if you wish to contact me, send me an e-mail instead of a PM.

Re: WindowMaker dead?

Hmmm... That kind of sucks. I hate the way Chrome looks with any system titlebar/border combo. I suppose it's not a huge issue, though.

Thank you for the answer. I knew there had to be a way. Unfortunately, it's an ugly, clunky-looking solution. Oh, well. It's not the end of the world.

Edit: I missed the word "try". Sorry. I'll have to try that when I have time. I was kind of hoping it would be a Fluxbox setting.

Last edited by EndlessDissent (2011-05-17 18:57:41)

Re: WindowMaker dead?

EndlessDissent wrote:

Hmmm... That kind of sucks. I hate the way Chrome looks with any system titlebar/border combo.

Try finding a different Fluxbox theme that looks better.

Note: ** Please read before posting **

BTW if you wish to contact me, send me an e-mail instead of a PM.

Re: WindowMaker dead?

EndlessDissent wrote:

@ElderV.LaCoste: Thank you for the suggestions. I actually tried Fluxbox for a little while this morning. I like it a lot, and it has support for WMaker-like dockapps in the slit, I also liked how easy it was to transfer the applicable entries from my Openbox autostart.sh to the Fluxbox startup file. However, one little thing kind of bugged me. Chrome doesn't fully maximize in Fluxbox, unless there's a setting I missed that would fix it. I'm going to go back into it later and see if I can't figure out how to configure the UI a little bit.

@Val_B: Thanks for the links. That's good news. Perhaps they'll release 0.95 or something this year. I, for one, will definitely be checking out the Liquid Lemur beta this Friday. In the meantime, I will probably install the ancient 0.92 version from the Debian repo to play with.

Go for it, Ed (Palemoon) has been working his ass of on Lemur, and I know that Corenominal and omns have helped out as well with advice, scripts etc. I've got it running on one of my laptops, and although i'm not a huge WMaker fan like Ed, I have to say it's really well put together.

I wouldn't mind seeing a Crunchbanged-up Wmaker, that would be pretty awesome. I nearly made a Fluxbang last year, but i'm hooked on openbox now and my distro-building days are over smile

Re: WindowMaker dead?

EndlessDissent wrote:

Wow. That's great news. I'm checking out the Liquid Lemur website now. Thanks for the heads up.

But just to clarify, are you saying that there is still some active development going on for WindowMaker? If so, do you know why there hasn't been a release in 5 years? Is it just slow, relaxed development at this point, so as to not cause stress to the developers while they enjoy their hobby? Is a universal release planned eventually, or is the only way to get it from now on going to be through the Liquid Lemur guys? Are you saying that the WMaker in Liquid Lemur is newer than 0.92? I was very disappointed to find out that this was the last stable release. They were so close to 1.0, and I never experienced any bugs in 0.92, so I can't imagine 1.0 was far off.

I'm sorry for asking so many questions. I was afraid my favorite window manager was permanently dead, and you've given me new hope. If you don't know the answers to any of my questions, that's perfectly fine. I can't expect you to know everything, especially since you and most other people probably never really give much thought to WMaker as it seems to be overshadowed by the *boxes and other "cool", trendy window managers like Awesome (all of which are perfectly fine, but are not WMaker).

Anyway, thank you for replying and giving me somewhere to look. It's greatly appreciated. I'm off to search through the Liquid Lemur website a bit more.

Hi EndlessDissent,

Rich notified me about this thread and I thought I would drop by.  smile

I had to register again...could have sworn I was already registered here...hmmm. tongue

Anyway, a small group of devs broke off on their own and have been keeping Window Maker alive. The http://dockapps.org site is also back online. A cool guy by the name of Carlos Mafra is the one fixing bugs and maintaining the source (with the help of others) for WM. The version in Liquid Lemur is currently 0.94-crm.

As Rich said, Liquid Lemur is basically #! so you should not have any trouble running WM on #! if you wanted. There is a 32bit only repo that is updated regularly here:

http://www.the-little-red-haired-girl.org/pub/wmaker/

I compiled a 64bit WM and, along with the 32bit, keep it in the Lemur repo here:

deb http://liquidlemur.org/debian/ squeeze main

You should be able to grab the "lemur-keyring" via apt-get, aptitude, synaptic, etc. If not, this will get you the key:

wget http://liquidlemur.org/apt/lemur.key && sudo apt-key add lemur.key -

The latest sources for WM can be had from here:

http://repo.or.cz/w/wmaker-crm.git

To quote Carlos:

Wmaker-crm is a fork based on the last known CVS version of Window Maker.
The -crm is to make it clear that it is not the original, but there are
no intentions to deviate from the "principles" which led to the great
Window Maker we all know.

I hope that helps you a bit. smile The next release of Lemur will be out on the 20th (Friday)...Just FYI. big_smile

Ed

Re: WindowMaker dead?

Val_B wrote:

Oh intresting, the Liquid Lemur guy seemed to have got his version from Carlos Mafra according to their dev log, who seems to have at least been doing some patches, poking around a bit I found http://lists.windowmaker.org/dev/mail22.html and if you look through it, you will see that at least a few people have been working on it, but it mostly seems the bugfix type of work, though I didn't read too many posts.

Oddly enough this has all the usual names on it, but seems to only be about a year old http://hg.windowmaker.info/wmaker/file/7accebd7c65b/

So, while the project seems pretty dead, there is at least some work on it, I would be quite interested to see Liquid Lemur bring some enhancements to Window Maker. I did enjoy it as a wm.

Hi Val_B,

You are correct. I use the sources from Carlos. The last patch was on 17 FEB 2011. And yes, it has been mostly bug fixes. Although, there has been a new feature or two added since 0.92. IIRC, Carlos wants to get all the bugs squashed and all the current features working, before adding more to it. tongue

The mailing lists have not been as active this year. Not sure why that is...school maybe? Anyway, things are still progressing. The version in Lemur is 0.94-crm, which is a huge improvement over 0.92.

Just FYI, I had two other WMaker distros in the past. The first was DreamStep (based on Dreamlinux)...which I killed off when I left the Dreamlinux team. I then had HEKA OS, that was a Debian Live type project. Corenominal and Omns provided much support and advice for HEKA. Liquid Lemur was to be a Xfce distro only, but I'm not ready to give up on Window Maker just yet. So, I brought it back with Lemur as the base. tongue

Ed

Re: WindowMaker dead?

Just another quick FYI...

For those not aware of it, there is a plugin for Xfce (xfce4-wmdock-plugin) that allows you to run Window Maker dock apps in Xfce. Not nearly as fine-tuned as Window Maker. But, if you are just looking to run some old dock apps then it is definitely a handy tool.

Ed

Re: WindowMaker dead?

palemoon wrote:

Hi EndlessDissent,

Rich notified me about this thread and I thought I would drop by.  smile

...snip for brevity...

I hope that helps you a bit. smile The next release of Lemur will be out on the 20th (Friday)...Just FYI. big_smile

Ed


That's a lot of great information there. That helps a lot. I can't thank you enough for dropping by and posting all those great links. I've added the the-little-red-haired-girl repo, and I'm about to install Window Maker again. I would have added your Liquid Lemur repo, but I upgraded to testing yesterday, and I'm not sure how well it would work. I am definitely planning on grabbing at least one of your Liquid Lemur isos on Friday, though. Whether it's the 32 or 64-bit version will depend on whether I use my laptop or desktop. I might even check out both just to see if there's a noticeable difference. I stopped by your forums to check them out last night, and I was impressed with the interface and organization. It looked like you put a lot of time and effort into the site. If your distro is similar at all, and I assume it is, I will most likely fall in love with it on Friday. Whether or not it replaces Crunchbang will most likely depend on if I'm feeling too lazy to backup all my data and go through another installation. I haven't even had Crunchbang installed for a week on either computer.

I thought I recognized the name Liquid Lemur. I remembered seeing it in a Distrowatch Weekly, in the "New distributions added to waiting list" section, but I wasn't sure until just now, thanks to Google. I didn't even think to look, though, because at the time, you were still using Xfce exclusively, and while I can't say I hated Xfce (I really didn't mind it at all when I tried it in Slackware), I definitely prefer WMaker and the *boxes. Good luck getting added to the official list. I'm not sure what the exact criteria are, but I think they said they were holding off adding new distributions until they proved themselves because of the sheer amount popping up and dying each day. It doesn't look like Liquid Lemur will be dying anytime soon, though, so I'll be watching the "New distributions added to database" section for "Liquid Lemur" and a big screenshot of WMaker (though, they'll probably use the Xfce version since it's more familiar to people).

I'm not sure how necessary of a suggestion this is since this seems like a given for any distro with WMaker installed, but I would suggest including WMakerConf in the default install. WMakerPrefs is fine, and it does its job, but WMakerConf is much more versatile, in my opinion. That is, unless there have been significant changes to Prefs or you have a config program of your own, anyway. Also, a selection of some basic dockapps in the default install or repo would be good, or perhaps a section in Easy Editions for them, or maybe just a link to dockapps.org in the docs. The dockapps, after all, are one of the main attractions to WMaker. Of course, ignore this paragraph if you're way ahead of me on this. Also, since Beta 2 is only a couple days away, if you haven't added these things yet, don't worry about rushing them into Beta 2. It's only the first Window Maker version, so I'll definitely forgive either omission and happily install that stuff myself.

Again, thank you for stopping by and providing all that info. It's greatly appreciated.

Re: WindowMaker dead?

anonymous wrote:
EndlessDissent wrote:

Hmmm... That kind of sucks. I hate the way Chrome looks with any system titlebar/border combo.

Try finding a different Fluxbox theme that looks better.

Well, the issue wasn't the theme. It's that I'm super picky, and for me, having the system titlebar/border just ruins the smooth, sleek Chrome look in general. Since I did like the rest of Fluxbox, I'm willing to give it a try - after I get WMaker configured, of course. :-)

Re: WindowMaker dead?

EndlessDissent wrote:
anonymous wrote:
EndlessDissent wrote:

Hmmm... That kind of sucks. I hate the way Chrome looks with any system titlebar/border combo.

Try finding a different Fluxbox theme that looks better.

Well, the issue wasn't the theme. It's that I'm super picky, and for me, having the system titlebar/border just ruins the smooth, sleek Chrome look in general. Since I did like the rest of Fluxbox, I'm willing to give it a try - after I get WMaker configured, of course. :-)

Are you using Fluxbox version 1.31?  I am not having any issues with chrome at all.  If you haven't already tried this you might try to stretch it (Chrome) out and then check the boxes for it to "remember" the size and position.

Proceed with confidence!
http://eldervlacoste.deviantart.com/

Re: WindowMaker dead?

Actually, I believe it was 1.1 - whatever was in the Squeeze repo. I upgraded to testing yesterday, and I saw that Fluxbox got upgraded. I haven't had a chance to check out the new version yet, though.

If it still maximizes the way it did in 1.1, I'll put up screenshots from OB and FB for comparison. Basically, what it did was fill the screen with Chrome, but Chrome itself wasn't fully maximized. You know how in most WMs and DEs (and Windows, for that matter), Chrome's titlebar (so to speak, as it doesn't have a title in the bar) extends a bit above the tabs when it's not maximized, and when it's maximized, the extra bit of the bar at the top collapses? The titlebar doesn't collapse in Fluxbox when maximized, but the actual Chrome window is stretched to fill the screen. You can see this if you resize it smaller than maximized and click the maximize button. It will stretch to fill the screen, but the titlebar won't collapse, the maximize button stays a single square as if it's not maximized, and if you move your mouse to the edge of the Chrome window, you can still manually resize it, unlike when the window is truly maximized in other window managers.

Really, it's not as big of a deal as I must seem to be making it. It was just a little quirk I noticed, and I was wondering if there was a setting I didn't know about that prevented Chrome from truly maximizing. It still fills the screen adequately, so it's not the end of the world, which is why I'd rather not use the system titlebar and borders, thus ruining the Chrome aesthetics. It's just something minor that I wanted to fix if I could.

Thank you, though, for taking the time to help. I'll check out the upgraded Fluxbox, and I'll post up the comparison screenshots later if it's still the same way.

Re: WindowMaker dead?

I think I see what you mean now.  I clicked on the wrench and went into preferences, chose "Personal Stuff" tab and from there selected "hide system title bar and use compact borders".  It works for me very nicely.  Hope you can get it working because Fluxbox is a great window manager.  Sorry if I am not understanding the problem.  The way it looks with the title bar gone is like this:  there is a tab(s) at the top on the left and window decorations on the right.  When it is maximized there is a minimize "_", two smaller squares, and an "X".  I found the directions here:  http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issue … l?id=82050

http://img6.imagebanana.com/img/mbbr1gae/thumb/20110518092355_1024x768_scrot.png

Last edited by ElderV.LaCoste (2011-05-18 13:27:40)

Proceed with confidence!
http://eldervlacoste.deviantart.com/

Re: WindowMaker dead?

Hmmm... I haven't read that link yet, but mine was already set to hide system titlebar and borders. Perhaps it was fixed in FB 1.3? Maybe I just have to toggle the setting? I'm still trying to find dockapps for WMaker, so I haven't gotten around to testing yet, sorry. When I do, I'll post results, with screenshots if the problem persists.

Edit: just saw the screenshot. That screenshot looks like it's maximized correctly. I'll test now. If it still doesn't maximize correctly for me, it must be some setting in Fluxbox, which means it's time for a Config Dig to find it.

Edit 2: It maximizes correctly now. It must have been a bug in FB 1.1. I can't remember how many times I maximized and unmaximized that window in 1.1 to test it. I don't know if I'd want to go through the trouble of installing 1.1 again to test it, but if someone still running Squeeze would like to test, I would love to know the results.

Edit 3 - last one. I promise: If anyone wants to view what it looked like for me when I maximized Chrome in FB 1.1, just stretch an unmaximized Chrome window to fill the screen. That's exactly how it was.

Last edited by EndlessDissent (2011-05-18 13:43:57)

Re: WindowMaker dead?

EndlessDissent wrote:

That's a lot of great information there. That helps a lot. I can't thank you enough for dropping by and posting all those great links. I've added the the-little-red-haired-girl repo, and I'm about to install Window Maker again. I would have added your Liquid Lemur repo, but I upgraded to testing yesterday, and I'm not sure how well it would work. I am definitely planning on grabbing at least one of your Liquid Lemur isos on Friday, though. Whether it's the 32 or 64-bit version will depend on whether I use my laptop or desktop. I might even check out both just to see if there's a noticeable difference. I stopped by your forums to check them out last night, and I was impressed with the interface and organization. It looked like you put a lot of time and effort into the site. If your distro is similar at all, and I assume it is, I will most likely fall in love with it on Friday. Whether or not it replaces Crunchbang will most likely depend on if I'm feeling too lazy to backup all my data and go through another installation. I haven't even had Crunchbang installed for a week on either computer.

The Lemur repo should be okay with "testing" although I haven't tested it. tongue The 64bit Window Maker in Lemur will lack a few dock apps. I can't seem to find the source so I can re-compile them for 64bit. Nothing critical though.

The Lemur site has gone through a few changes since Lemur started. I think I finally got it sorted now. Still some tweaking to do here and there, but I'm happy with it. tongue

If you just want to add Window Maker to your current #! setup, I can send you the Lemur Window Maker bits to paste into your #!. Then you'll have the best of both worlds. big_smile

EndlessDissent wrote:

I thought I recognized the name Liquid Lemur. I remembered seeing it in a Distrowatch Weekly, in the "New distributions added to waiting list" section, but I wasn't sure until just now, thanks to Google. I didn't even think to look, though, because at the time, you were still using Xfce exclusively, and while I can't say I hated Xfce (I really didn't mind it at all when I tried it in Slackware), I definitely prefer WMaker and the *boxes. Good luck getting added to the official list. I'm not sure what the exact criteria are, but I think they said they were holding off adding new distributions until they proved themselves because of the sheer amount popping up and dying each day. It doesn't look like Liquid Lemur will be dying anytime soon, though, so I'll be watching the "New distributions added to database" section for "Liquid Lemur" and a big screenshot of WMaker (though, they'll probably use the Xfce version since it's more familiar to people).

I'm not holding my breath with Distrowatch. lol I've seen many a distro still on the waiting list, that met their "criteria" long ago. Anyway, just being on the waiting list killed my server for 3 days. big_smile Thanks to corenominal's suggestion, I moved the ISOs to a torrent host. Lemur does not have a huge budget (in fact, it doesn't have a budget at all...lol) so I do what I can.

I've had two other Window Maker distros in the past (DreamStep and HEKA OS). I also did the Window Maker setup for Rich's TOTALinux distro. I killed DreamStep after I left the Dreamlinux team (it was based on Dreamlinux). Then I created HEKA (thanks to corenominal and omns for all the help there). I eventually killed HEKA. Mostly due to complaints about it being a DVD size Window Maker (which is apparently taboo). I went back to the Dreamlinux team for a bit and that's the other reason HEKA was pulled. The Dreamlinux gig didn't go as planned so I left again, and Liquid Lemur was born. Window Maker has always been my passion, but I felt the need to make a Dreamlinux-ish distro to fill the void. Now that I've done that, I'm back at tinkering with Window Maker. big_smile

EndlessDissent wrote:

I'm not sure how necessary of a suggestion this is since this seems like a given for any distro with WMaker installed, but I would suggest including WMakerConf in the default install. WMakerPrefs is fine, and it does its job, but WMakerConf is much more versatile, in my opinion. That is, unless there have been significant changes to Prefs or you have a config program of your own, anyway. Also, a selection of some basic dockapps in the default install or repo would be good, or perhaps a section in Easy Editions for them, or maybe just a link to dockapps.org in the docs. The dockapps, after all, are one of the main attractions to WMaker. Of course, ignore this paragraph if you're way ahead of me on this. Also, since Beta 2 is only a couple days away, if you haven't added these things yet, don't worry about rushing them into Beta 2. It's only the first Window Maker version, so I'll definitely forgive either omission and happily install that stuff myself.

Again, thank you for stopping by and providing all that info. It's greatly appreciated.

I always include WMakerConf, as I like it more. However, there are changes in WPrefs that are critical to the Window Maker configuration (at least in 0.94.0-crm) that aren't in WMakerConf. I will eventually grab the source for WMakerConf and update it. Just need to find some free time. tongue Anyway, Lemur has both WMakerConf and WPrefs installed by default.

I include a ton of dock apps in the default install (just ask Rich about the list of wm* apps I sent him for TOTALinux back when it was active!). The only problem will be the 64bit version, as I can't seem to find all the source code for the dock apps used. The Lemur control panel also has a button to take you straight to dockapps.org for getting your favorite apps. smile

Thanks for the feedback! So, maybe people are still interested in a Window Maker distro? That's good! I wasn't sure if I should mess with it anymore, but Rich keeps telling me to stick with it...and I guess he's right. tongue

Again, if you want the Lemur Window Maker setup to add to your #!, just let me know and I'll package it up for you. big_smile

Ed

Re: WindowMaker dead?

@Palemoon - I am really looking forward to Friday.  Keep up the good work.  smile

[edit]

I am psyched about the Window Maker edition.  I was just on your website and I must say the artwork is really excellent as well!

Last edited by ElderV.LaCoste (2011-05-18 16:25:07)

Proceed with confidence!
http://eldervlacoste.deviantart.com/

Re: WindowMaker dead?

ElderV.LaCoste wrote:

@Palemoon - I am really looking forward to Friday.  Keep up the good work.  smile

Thanks! I'm building the final ISOs now. smile

Re: WindowMaker dead?

Count me in as a Liquid Lemur tester smile

- closed account - gone to better places -