ErSandro wrote:Yes, you have to compile musca by yourself (it's very simple, the binary is really small).
yes, so i heard, and why i wanted to try musca. that's probably why i can't find twmn in the repos either.
ErSandro wrote:if you want to install only software in repos
i stick to pkgs in debian repos, as i don't have any compilers or dev libs installed.
perhaps i should install all dev pkgs, but i'm in two minds..
scrotwm seems to be leaner than ratpoison. hence, i started looking into it. but the initial setup with bar on top, red borders throw me off. and i always maximise all windows. maybe i need to get used to it.
ErSandro wrote:I suggest you to give a look to the SalixOs .ratpoisonrc, very inspiring indeed.
i'll have a look. but why do you suggest salix, when you yourself use arch?
ErSandro wrote:The softwares i use the most are: ranger (cli file manager), newsbeuter (cli feed aggregator), uzbl (web browser), MOC and mplayer.
i don't have python installed. so ranger is out of scope. i use (x)links2 as a file manager, when i need to. :-)
luv newsbeuter. also use it with google reader sync mode! very dandy..
i like the uzbl philosophy. but on debian, uzbl wants to pull in additional 33 dependencies. seems like it wants the whole world and all their mother-in-laws. cancelled!
i have elinks, xlinks2, opera and firefox.
mplayer can play audio and video both. so i don't use any other audio pkgs.
ErSandro wrote:I use a couple of scripts and shell functions to mount/unmount remote filesystems (I use sshfs) and to launch youtube-dl (I did not install flash).
Just a little trick to stream videos from youtube without flash:
$ mplayer `youtube-dl -f 35 -g videourl`
-f 35 sets the video quality to 480p FLV (my laptop processor is a centrino M and cannot manage hi-res videos. By default youtube-dl gets the video at the best available quality)
-g tells to youtube-dl to retrieve the video url without downloading it.
Just substitute videourl, it works with a lot of sites (at least youtube, vimeo and blip.tv that are the ones i'm interested in)
that's a very nice way to hack through. i installed flash, don't like it, and set it on demand only.
i use quvi, which is a lot smaller than youtube-dl. i try something similar ( quvi -f flv_240p|mp4_360p ). i always manually set youtube to the smallest (240) resolution, jacking up only if unsatisfactory.on a 800x600 screen that is good enough!
ErSandro wrote:Almost forgot, the base is a clean Arch install.
This configuration gives me a very fast system with an old processor (1.4 Ghz Centrino M) and 512 mb of RAM.
my base is debian-testing, started out as a debian-stable minimal netinstall few years ago. never had a problem.
i like arch very much. issue was clean install of only the initial base arch took >700m, before i installed any pkgs, X, browsers, etc. i have all of the above plus some more in <650m diskspace!!
also i have /tmp, /var/tmp and a few mounted in ram. blazing fast on my 192m ram! definitely faster than the quad-core work laptop with windozzze!
and i'm constantly looking for smaller and more efficient apps. moment i find one, i replace my existing ones..
Last edited by josephg (2011-11-11 00:51:46)