[ Closed ] omns review of the new point release on Into the abyss (Page 2 of 2)

Thank you omns, for making that small edit to the bottom of your blog post and then totally removing said blog post so that this thread no longer makes any sense or can be read in context! You should have the courage of your convictions and stand by what you write, as I have previously said to you before.

You have been a fantastic advocate for CrunchBang and a complete asset to the project as a moderator, so I am sorry to see you go like this. I wish you the best for any future endeavours.

@bobobex, I'm well aware that the way I manage my online content is not perfect but taking into account your words of advice I've edited the original article and re-published it here http://omnsandlinux.blogspot.com/2011/1 … hbang.html

Thank you for the kind words re my time here

Last edited by omns (2011-12-01 07:32:02)

Now I'm not confused anymore. The interwebz has come full circle.

Honestly, no idea what's wrong with the review. I would be interested what made the OB session feel laggy, or if problems are buried somewhere else. And the thing about backports, well - all or nothing, I don't like this half-hearted solutions like bpo, so: agree And the line "I wouldn't be comfortable recommending this release to others unless they were very comfortable with Debian" applies to all distributions, and basically depend on the personal interest in troubleshooting, reading, learning - and I don't see anything wrong with the statement. Can we comfortably recommend Arch, Ubuntu, Slackware? For somebody who has never used Linux, and is simply nor interested in computers, I wouldn't recommend Linux

I know it's interesting and stuff, but I have the feeling we should give this one a rest. It seems like there has been a certain tension going way beyond the article.