Re: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd6 in backports
Hey, there's a rt variant of 3.2 for amd64 in backports!
youtu.be/bVURsxuwy_E
Re: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd6 in backports
Too bad everyone's just finishing rolling out all these 3.2 kernels right before the security patch came out to guard from mempodipper. The one in liquorix repo is still vulnerable too.
Re: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd6 in backports
Too bad everyone's just finishing rolling out all these 3.2 kernels right before the security patch came out to guard from mempodipper. The one in liquorix repo is still vulnerable too.
people on servers are most likely on .32, so I don't think it's such a big deal. I would like smxi to update and include Catalyst 12.1 today!
Last edited by el_koraco (2012-01-26 16:36:37)
Re: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd6 in backports
I disabled sshd on my computer at home just in case, so I'd like a patched kernel. I could grab the sid one but I'll probably just wait for the new liquorix. It's awesome that they're backporting some newer kernels finally though.
Re: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd6 in backports
so what you're telling me is that after all that work I put into getting 3.1 going, just days later 3.2 is available. Ugh...Can't wait to see what comes out of this. Good thing I just got re-upped my beer supply and I got my lucky coin from Chinese New Year.
Re: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd6 in backports
Ran the update without issue on my lappy which gave me fits with the older 2.6 configs. Works great, memory utilization seems a little cleaner once the initial openbox load is completed.
Schlzm
Re: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd6 in backports
Hey, what's the difference between the variants? I'd like to try one out?
![]()
HP dv5-2077cl, ATI Radeon HD 4250
Statler 64bit bpo
Re: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd6 in backports
Re: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd6 in backports
Love it when things "fix themselves".:)
HP dv5-2077cl, ATI Radeon HD 4250
Statler 64bit bpo
Re: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd6 in backports
^ & ^^ I had a feeling it would; as I mentioned, this seems to be a recurring glitch with the significant kernel updates. Looks like quite a few other packages, from ffmpeg to hplip to gimp, are also getting updates...I'm sure some of them have something to do with the recent security issue...
Re: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd6 in backports
Re: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd6 in backports
I had a little more, but I also roll with the debian-multimedia repo instead of Philip's mirror. (Philip's Mirror - horror movie or band name?
) 791kB freed!
Re: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd6 in backports
Bit the bullet and installed linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 (3.2.1-2~bpo60+1).
No issues
Also had that whopper of an update. ![]()
Last edited by Dave W. (2012-01-28 18:31:59)
HP dv5-2077cl, ATI Radeon HD 4250
Statler 64bit bpo
Re: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd6 in backports
^ Ha-hAHh!
Re: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd6 in backports
with illustrations by el_koraco.
I'll use the American grading system for this. In elementary school, in arts class, everybody was getting straight A's, no matter what kind of garbage they drew or carved. I was so bad, I'd never get anything higher than a C. Seriously, I wouldn't be able to draw a stick figure comic like xkcd.
Re: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd6 in backports
I have to say that Debian rules with such updates from backports on a stable basis. Incredible!
Re: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd6 in backports
Right after booting, I immediately went to tty1 and tried logging in and out several times. I was so excited to find that the keyboard issue appeared to be gone! ...then I went to tty7, logged in via SLiM, and...same old same-old on tty1. ![]()
Is the graphical session somehow "bound" to tty1?
Re: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd6 in backports
I have to say that Debian rules with such updates from backports on a stable basis. Incredible!
Incredible yes, upgraded my desktop today, looks like everything is ok. One question though.
For how long can/dare I install the stuff from backports on a stable basis? The answer is probably
til it goes #!
Is there anyone here who have some thoughts on the subject?
Re: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd6 in backports
Is there anyone here who have some thoughts on the subject?
Regular packages, like multimedia and office software, text editors, that kind of thing are pretty much zero problems. ALSA and proprietary video drivers can be a pain with kernel and X upgrades, but it's not unmanageable. I wouldn't do heavy backporting of server software, but few people do that (there's a reason Debian is the nr 1 server OS in the world), and I doubt that one was your concern.
Re: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd6 in backports
You were right of course, that was not my concern. Thanks el_k.