Topic: Flash video & package updates

OK, I've just recently installed #! and I like it. The trouble is I'd like to be able to watch streamed video content on this machine and at the moment it ain't working. It's a low spec machine, albeit maxed out for what it is (PII 500, 384mb RAM, 4gig HD, ATI AGP graphics). I found that streamed Flash video just about worked on the last OS (Windows 2000) and actually played fairly smoothly in full screen. However, with #! YouTube videos are so jerky as to be unwatchable and BBC iPlayer causes Firefox to crash after a few jerky frames.

Video performance is pretty decent playing a DIVX video straight from a CD.

I've run a system update from the right click menu. Checking in package manager "adobe-flashplugin" seems to be up to date (10.0) but Firefox is stuck on version 3. I'm a little confused about updating as there are lots of different packages listed. Also, what does the little Ubuntu logo mean?

Any help appreciated!

Re: Flash video & package updates

Welcome to the forums! In my opinion and experience, your processor is too slow for streaming flash video in Linux. sad Try downloading the video to your hard drive first, then watch it locally using VLC. It may not be pretty, but it will be more watchable. smile

If you've just installed #! 9.04, you will have many, many updates... this is normal, because it's been a year since 9.04's release. If you want a newer Firefox, I've had pretty good luck with Ubuntuzilla: http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/u … =Main_Page

Re: Flash video & package updates

Sorry, realised this should be in the help and support section. Have reposted - please feel free to delete this.

Re: Flash video & package updates

I appreciate the reply, but is it really the case that #! will give poorer streamed video than win2K? This seems bizarre, particularly as it plays non-streamed video MUCH better, but also as the internet connection seems so much better.

My laptop runs Ubuntu and flash video is superior to previous XP install...

Re: Flash video & package updates

bluetomgold wrote:

I appreciate the reply, but is it really the case that #! will give poorer streamed video than win2K? This seems bizarre, particularly as it plays non-streamed video MUCH better, but also as the internet connection seems so much better.

My laptop runs Ubuntu and flash video is superior to previous XP install...

1) Win2k is from 2000 and CrunchBang 9.04 is from 2009. Their minimum system requirements are very different. smile
2) Flash is proprietary (non-free) software and simply performs better in Windows than in Linux. sad

But hey, did you try my suggestion to download the video first?

(edit) Also it might be helpful to check what kind of graphics card you have, and if any restricted hardware drivers are available.

Last edited by snowpine (2010-05-11 22:39:27)

Re: Flash video & package updates

My laptop runs Ubuntu and flash video is superior to previous XP install...

Is this laptop the same machine in question or a different one? If its the same, I can't imagine why ubuntu flash would be better than #!'s....

Sadly I imagine that the case could well be that flash is superior on win2k than even the newest #!. Flash performance is poor in Linux compared to  Win platforms. With the non-free (not open source) Flash plugins, there is little that can be done to remedy this disparity without a massive engineering effort I would imagine (either by the Linux community or Adobe.)

IRC: PizzaAndWine     Script bits: Incremental Backup | Sleep Timer

Re: Flash video & package updates

The laptop is a different (faster) machine. My point was simply - if Ubuntu runs flash better than XP then surely the lean, modern Crunchbang should be better than bloated and dated win 2K? Slightly drawn-out logic I know, but odd that my previous experience was that Flash video plays well under Ubuntu.

Either way I'm sure #! is capable of better performance with iPlayer than playing a few frames and simply crashing and I'd appreciate some advice on which browser/plugins are likely to work best, and how to install them. Likewise if there are any cache/buffer issues which might solve my problem.

Re: Flash video & package updates

CrunchBang 9.04 is Ubuntu.

500mhz Pentium 2 is too slow for fullscreen, streaming Linux flash video, in my experience. This is based on trying dozens of distros, and is not #!-specific.

Curious if you have tried either of my previous suggestions: 1) download the video and watch it from your hard drive? 2) find out what kind of graphics card you have...

Last edited by snowpine (2010-05-11 23:41:18)

Re: Flash video & package updates

CrunchBang 9.04 is Ubuntu.

Yes, exactly! Although it should run faster than a full Ubuntu distro, right?

1) download the video and watch it from your hard drive?

Trouble is most Flash based sites either block downloads or make you set up a user account to do so. Will try and report back

As I said, DivX playback is very good.

2) find out what kind of graphics card you have...

It's some kind of ATI Rage Pro AGP, not sure of exact model nor how to check in crunchbang. Nothing listed in Restricted Device Manager.

Last edited by bluetomgold (2010-05-12 00:03:41)

Re: Flash video & package updates

bluetomgold wrote:

Trouble is most Flash based sites either block downloads or make you set up a user account to do so. Will try and report back

As I said, DivX playback is very good.

2) find out what kind of graphics card you have...

It's some kind of ATI Rage Pro AGP, not sure of exact model nor how to check in crunchbang. Nothing listed in Restricted Device Manager.

You can get flashed based content a few different ways.
Most notably, search for 'youtube downloader' or similar, and look for an online service that will do it for you.
Also, you noted that 'nothing is listed in restricted device manager', it begs the question, is something normally listed in Ubuntu???

just call me...
~FSM~

Re: Flash video & package updates

FiniteStateMachine wrote:

Also, you noted that 'nothing is listed in restricted device manager', it begs the question, is something normally listed in Ubuntu???

I've never run Ubuntu on this machine. I looked here out of curiosity and other than here I have no idea where to find out what drivers are loaded, or available.

Last edited by bluetomgold (2010-05-12 00:19:18)

Re: Flash video & package updates

bluetomgold wrote:

Yes, exactly! Although it should run faster than a full Ubuntu distro, right?

Why would it? I'll repeat: the Adobe Flash player is proprietary, non-free, closed-source software. There is nothing that Corenomial (CrunchBang's developer) can do to make CrunchBang's flash player any better/faster than any other Linux distro. Because it is not open-source software, only Adobe can improve or modify it.

bluetomgold wrote:

Trouble is most Flash based sites either block downloads or make you set up a user account to do so. Will try and report back

Check your /tmp folder. wink

bluetomgold wrote:

It's some kind of ATI Rage Pro AGP, not sure of exact model nor how to check in crunchbang. Nothing listed in Restricted Device Manager.

Sorry but I am not an expert on ATI cards... you might find these links helpful:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/RadeonDriver
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/BinaryDriverHowto/ATI

Re: Flash video & package updates

snowpine wrote:
bluetomgold wrote:

Yes, exactly! Although it should run faster than a full Ubuntu distro, right?

Why would it? I'll repeat: the Adobe Flash player is proprietary, non-free, closed-source software. There is nothing that Corenomial (CrunchBang's developer) can do to make CrunchBang's flash player any better/faster than any other Linux distro. Because it is not open-source software, only Adobe can improve or modify it.

Yes, I understand that the Flash driver is proprietary. And I understand that in itself it is no better under crunchbang than a standard Ubuntu distro. And I accept that the driver may be less efficient than the Windows one. But, on a low-spec PC, I would have hoped that the less resource-hungry distro (i.e. #!) would give the machine a better chance of successfully streaming video. Is that unreasonable?

OK. I have pulled some Flash files out of my temp folder. When streaming they are very jerky even though they buffer ahead of playback. In VLC they play smooth as silk, full screen.

Last edited by bluetomgold (2010-05-12 00:44:01)

Re: Flash video & package updates

bluetomgold wrote:

OK. I have pulled some Flash files out of my temp folder. When streaming they are very jerky even though they buffer ahead of playback. In VLC they play smooth as silk, full screen.

That is consistent with my experience on my 500mhz Pentium 3 with 256mb ram.

I just found this page, interesting:

http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/systemreqs/

Adobe claims their Flash player requires an 800mhz processor, and 512mb ram plus 128mb graphics ram for Linux, compared with only 450mhz and 128mb ram for Windows. So there is your answer. smile

Re: Flash video & package updates

Very frustrating. I'd still appreciate some advice on upgrading Firefox and perhaps installing Chrome. Crunchbang is nice but it's not half as beginner-friendly as regular Ubuntu. And Firefox 3 clearly does have some issues if iPlayer crashes it.

snowpine wrote:

I just found this page, interesting:

http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/systemreqs/

Adobe claims their Flash player requires an 800mhz processor, and 512mb ram plus 128mb graphics ram for Linux, compared with only 450mhz and 128mb ram for Windows. So there is your answer. smile

If you check further down the specs you'll see that they quote equal requirements for video playback irrespective of OS. Although that's clearly rubbish. My experience is that Flash is even worse on older Macs... my girlfriend's G4 800 with 768mb won't play Flash video properly either... But my previous experiences with Flash and Linux have been good, so I'm not convinced that the only issues at play are the speed of my machine and the lousy proprietary drivers Adobe provide.

Re: Flash video & package updates

See post #2. Ubuntuzilla will get you the latest stable Firefox.

And then there's always http://firefox.com ... that works too!

Re: Flash video & package updates

snowpine wrote:

See post #2. Ubuntuzilla will get you the latest stable Firefox.

And then there's always http://firefox.com ... that works too!

So, excuse me for being new to this, but if I add the ubuntuzilla repository to my /etc/apt/sources.list, does that mean I will automatically get updates by doing a system update (right click menu)? If not then what?

Snowpine, I do understand that you've had a similar experience and haven't managed to improve your Flash performance, but I do feel that Crunchbang should be capable of better considering how well it allows this machine to perform in general. I note with interest that I am not the only one that feels there may be specific issues with #! and Firefox and Flash:

http://crunchbanglinux.org/forums/topic … runchbang/

Particularly interesting: "I tried streaming directly to VLC and everything is OK, even at full screen mode."

How do I open up a stream (e.g. iPlayer, YouTube) in VLC?

Re: Flash video & package updates

Flash's performance is mostly dependant on your CPU. Using a lighter OS doesn't necessarily help with this.

As for streaming, for YouTube at least you can use the Greasemonkey add-on for Firefox and a script:

http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/75710
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/50771
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/25318
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/55619

Keep in mind, I haven't tested them and do not if they work.

Note: ** Please read before posting **

BTW if you wish to contact me, send me an e-mail instead of a PM.